The World Cup stadia fiasco is the latest high-profile project where management failed to monitor costs and revenue.
As the World Cup 2014 approached, Brazil's chaotic stadia programme was still limping to its long-overdue conclusion.
With the $3.4 billion cost almost 50% over forecasts, the country's construction industry is paying a heavy penalty for its failures.
However, massive construction cost management overruns are even possible for the company whose technological nous has earned it global acclaim - Apple.
Steve Jobs unveiled plans to construct a futuristic new HQ in California in 2011 and reckoned it could be built for less than $3 billion.
Already, before work even starts at the 100-acre site, the estimated cost of the 'spaceship' design has hit $5 billion ... and it's three years late.
The West Coast has another big name in the construction cost management League of Shame, as the $6 billion bridge across San Francisco Bay was a remarkable six years late and five times over budget.
The war of words between the US and China covers everything from cyber-security to trade tariffs, but the latter certainly can't crow over its rival's design and build failures.
A Chinese-owned iron ore mine in Australia is not far behind Apple, when it comes to budget-busting at nearly $8bn over budget and four years late.
So how can construction cost management go so badly wrong?
Ego is a factor, as companies look to win prestige projects by bidding at under-cost or on narrow margins.
However, failure to understand, calculate and accurately monitor the various cost-revenue streams remains the major influence on construction cost management failures, wherever the project is based - and whatever its purpose.
